Tuesday, July 29, 2014

Bjorn Lomborg: The Junk Science Maestro in Scientific American



Letter sent to Scientific American in response to the article "ClimeApocalypse".



Letters to the Editor

Scientific American


In “ClimeApocalypse”, Michael Shermer seems to be advancing climate denialism by stating that  “Climate change is not our only problem.” This statement diminishes the immediacy of a formidable concern. As the window for mitigating the impacts of climate change rapidly closes, Shermer’s skepticism only ensures scenarios that are more intractable and dire. The complex consequences of climate instability pose the most significant and immediate threat to the viability of our natural life support system.  I would counsel Shermer to read leading climatologist James Hansen’s book “Storms of My Grandchildren” which provides a compelling summary of the overwhelming evidence for dangerous and potentially irreversible warming. As we burn more carbon (atmospheric levels recently exceeded 400 ppm from pre-industrial levels of 280 ppm), our children and grandchildren will be forced to reckon with a world no one alive today would recognize.

Shermer’s use of Bjorn Lomborg as an authoritative source is laughable. Lomborg has degrees in political science with no background in science or climatology. His first book “The Skeptical Environmentalist,” is a polemic of politicized science that nurtures continued complacency among the uninformed. Lomborg’s disdain for economic sustainability on a small planet with finite resources and an estimated carrying capacity of 2.5 billion people is dishonest and negligent. His book is a fairy tale of thinly disguised science filled with gross distortions and simplifications of complex issues.

Lomborg’s disingenuous advocacy and sloppy scholarship resulted in very negative reviews of the “The Skeptical Environmentalist” in Nature, Science, and Scientific American. Shermer, and the think tank economists he gives so much credence to, seem oblivious to the frightening reality that every issue on the Copenhagen Consensus Center’s list  (with the exception of an exponentially growing human population) is currently affected by greenhouse warming and will become more intransigent as levels of heat trapping gases continue to rise. Unabated population growth will act as one more positive feedback process that will exacerbate the rate and magnitude of the planet’s warming.

Jeff Johnson

Wakefield, R.I.  02879

401-789-4570

No comments: